Paper detail

The contact mechanics challenge: Problem definition

We present a contact mechanics problem, which we consider to be representative for contacts between nominally flat surfaces. The main ingredients of the mathematically fully defined contact problem are: Self-affine roughness, linear elasticity, the small-slope approximation, and short-range adhesion between the frictionless surfaces. Surface energies, elastic contact modulus and computer-generated surface topographies are provided at www.lms.uni-saarland.de/contact-mechanics-challenge. To minimize the undesirable but frequent problem of unit conversion errors, we provide some benchmark results, such as the relative contact area as a function of load $a_{\rm r}(L)$ between $0.1\%$ and $15\%$ relative contact. We call theorists and numericists alike to predict quantities that contain more information than $a_{\rm r}(L)$ and provide information on how to submit predictions. Examples for quantities of interest are the mean gap or contact stiffness as a function of load as well as distributions of contact patch size, interfacial stress, and interfacial separation at a reference load. Numerically accurate reference results will be disseminated in subsequent work including an evaluation of the submitted results.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.