Paper detail

The Constituent Chiral Quark Model Revisited

We reconsider the Constituent Chiral Quark Model of Manohar and Georgi in the presence of $SU(3)_{L}\times SU(3)_{R}$ external sources. As recently emphasized by Weinberg, the corresponding effective Lagrangian is renormalizable in the Large--${\rm N_c}$ limit. We show, however, that the number of the required counterterms depends crucially on the value of $g_A$ and it is minimized for $g_A =1$. We then find that with a rather small value for the constituent quark mass, which we fix phenomenologically to $M_Q =(190\pm 40)\MeV$, the model reproduces rather well the values of several well known low energy constants. We also comment on the limitations of the model as well as on a few {\it exceptional} applications, to more complicated low--energy observables, where one can expect the model to make reasonably good predictions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.