The Connection between the Number of Realizations for Degree Sequences and Majorization

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

The \emph{graph realization problem} is to find for given nonnegative integers a1,…,ana_1,\dots,a_n a simple graph (no loops or multiple edges) such that each vertex viv_i has degree ai.a_i. Given pairs of nonnegative integers (a1,b1),…,(an,bn),(a_1,b_1),\dots,(a_n,b_n), (i) the \emph{bipartite realization problem} ask whether there is a bipartite graph (no loops or multiple edges) such that vectors (a1,...,an)(a_1,...,a_n) and (b1,...,bn)(b_1,...,b_n) correspond to the lists of degrees in the two partite sets, (ii) the \emph{digraph realization problem} is to find a digraph (no loops or multiple arcs) such that each vertex viv_i has indegree aia_i and outdegree bi.b_i.\\ The classic literature provides characterizations for the existence of such realizations that are strongly related to the concept of majorization. Aigner and Triesch (1994) extended this approach to a more general result for graphs, leading to an efficient realization algorithm and a short and simple proof for the Erdős-Gallai Theorem. We extend this approach to the bipartite realization problem and the digraph realization problem.\\ Our main result is the connection between majorization and the number of realizations for a degree list in all three problems. We show: if degree list S′S' majorizes SS in a certain sense, then SS possesses more realizations than S′.S'. We prove that constant lists possess the largest number of realizations for fixed nn and a fixed number of arcs mm when nn divides m.m. So-called \emph{minconvex lists} for graphs and bipartite graphs or \emph{opposed minconvex lists} for digraphs maximize the number of realizations when nn does not divide mm.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.