Paper detail

The connection between radio-loudness and central surface brightness profiles in optically-selected low-luminosity active galaxies

Recent results indicate a correlation between nuclear radio-loudness of active galaxies and their central stellar surface-brightness profiles, in that `core&#39; galaxies (with inner logarithmic slope γ<0.3) are significantly more radio loud than `power-law&#39; galaxies (γ>0.5). This connection, which indicates possible links between radio-loudness and galaxy formation history (e.g. through black hole spin) has so far only been confirmed for a radio-selected sample of galaxies. Furthermore, it has since been shown that the Nuker law, which was used to parameterise the brightness profiles in these studies, gives a poor description of the brightness profile. Here, we present an analysis of the central surface brightness profiles of the active galaxies of Hubble Type T<3, that were identified by the optically-selected Palomar spectroscopic survey of nearby galaxies. We fit the brightness profiles using Sersic, Core-Sersic and, where necessary, Double-Sersic models, which we fit to the semi-major axis brightness profiles extracted from high resolution images of the galaxies from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We use these fits to classify the galaxies as `Core&#39;, `Sersic&#39; or `Double-Sersic&#39; and compare this classification with the properties of the Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs). We find that AGN hosted in Core galaxies are generally more radio-loud than those hosted in Sersic galaxies, although there is a large overlap between the two subsamples. The correlation between radio-loudness and brightness profile can partly be explained by a correlation between radio-loudness and black hole mass. Additionally, there is a significant (99 per cent confidence) partial correlation between radio-loudness and the Core/Sersic classification of the host galaxy, which lends support to the previous results based on the radio-selected sample.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.