Paper detail

The compliance of the upper critical field in magic-angle multilayer graphene with the Pauli limit

The Pauli limiting field represents fundamental magnetic field at which superconducting state collapses due to the spin-paramagnetic Cooper pair-breaking effect. Cao et al [1] reported that the upper critical field (i.e., the magnetic field at which the superconducting state collapses in experiment) in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene (MATNG, N=3) in 2-3 times exceeds the Pauli limiting field in this material. This observation was interpreted as a violation of the Pauli-limiting field in MAT3G. Similar conclusions were recently reported by the same research group in MATNG (N=4,5) superlattices [2]. Here we point out that Cao et al [1] calculated the Pauli limiting field by the use of reduce (to the weak-coupling limit) full equation of the electron-phonon mediated superconductivity. Considering, that in the same paper, Cao et al [1] reported that MATNGs are strong coupled superconductors, we calculate the Pauli limiting field for strong coupled case and show that the observed upper critical fields in MATNGs comply with the Pauli limit. This implies that there is no violation of the Pauli limiting field in the Moire multilayer graphene superlattices.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.