Paper detail

The complexity that the first stars brought to the Universe: Fragility of metal enriched gas in a radiation field

The initial mass function (IMF) of the first (Population III) stars and Population II (Pop II) stars is poorly known due to a lack of observations of the period between recombination and reionization. In simulations of the formation of the first stars, it has been shown that, due to the limited ability of metal-free primordial gas to cool, the IMF of the first stars is a few orders of magnitude more massive than the current IMF. The transition from a high-mass IMF of the first stars to a lower-mass current IMF is thus important to understand. To study the underlying physics of this transition, we performed several simulations using the cosmological hydrodynamic adaptive mesh refinement code Enzo for metallicities of 10^{-4}, 10^{-3}, 10^{-2}, and 10^{-1} Z_{\odot}. In our simulations we include a star formation prescription that is derived from a metallicity dependent multi-phase ISM structure, an external UV radiation field, and a mechanical feedback algorithm. We also implement cosmic ray heating, photoelectric heating and gas-dust heating/cooling, and follow the metal enrichment of the ISM. It is found that the interplay between metallicity and UV radiation leads to the co-existence of Pop III and Pop II star formation in non-zero metallicity (Z/Z_{\odot} \geq10^{-2}) gas. A cold (T<100 K) and dense (ρ>10^{-22} g cm^{-3}) gas phase is fragile to ambient UV radiation. In a metal-poor (Z/Z_{\odot} \leq10^{-3}) gas, the cold and dense gas phase does not form in the presence of a radiation field of F_{0}\sim10^{-5}-10^{-4} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1}. Therefore, metallicity by itself is not a good indicator of the Pop III-Pop II transition. Metal-rich (Z/Z_{\odot}\geq10^{-2}) gas dynamically evolves two to three orders of magnitude faster than metal poor gas (Z/Z_{\odot}\leq10^{-3}). The simulations including SNe show that pre-enrichment of the halo does not affect the mixing of metals.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.