Paper detail

The Complexity of Resilience for Digraph Queries

We prove a complexity dichotomy for the resilience problem for unions of conjunctive digraph queries (i.e., for existential positive sentences over the signature $\{R\}$ of directed graphs). Specifically, for every union $μ$ of conjunctive digraph queries, the following problem is in P or NP-complete: given a directed multigraph $G$ and a natural number $u$, can we remove $u$ edges from $G$ so that $G \models \neg μ$? In fact, we verify a more general dichotomy conjecture from (Bodirsky et al., 2024) for all resilience problems in the special case of directed graphs, and show that for such unions of queries $μ$ there exists a countably infinite ('dual') valued structure $Δ_μ$ which either primitively positively constructs 1-in-3-3-SAT, and hence the resilience problem for $μ$ is NP-complete by general principles, or has a pseudo cyclic canonical fractional polymorphism, and the resilience problem for $μ$ is in P.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.