Paper detail

The Complexity of One or Many Faces in the Overlay of Many Arrangements

We present an extension of the Combination Lemma of [GSS89] that expresses the complexity of one or several faces in the overlay of many arrangements, as a function of the number of arrangements, the number of faces, and the complexities of these faces in the separate arrangements. Several applications of the new Combination Lemma are presented: We first show that the complexity of a single face in an arrangement of $k$ simple polygons with a total of $n$ sides is $Θ(n α(k) )$, where $α(\cdot)$ is the inverse of Ackermann's function. We also give a new and simpler proof of the bound $O \left( \sqrt{m} λ_{s+2}( n ) \right)$ on the total number of edges of $m$ faces in an arrangement of $n$ Jordan arcs, each pair of which intersect in at most $s$ points, where $λ_{s}(n)$ is the maximum length of a Davenport-Schinzel sequence of order $s$ with $n$ symbols. We extend this result, showing that the total number of edges of $m$ faces in a sparse arrangement of $n$ Jordan arcs is $O \left( (n + \sqrt{m}\sqrt{w}) \frac{λ_{s+2}(n)}{n} \right)$, where $w$ is the total complexity of the arrangement. Several other applications and variants of the Combination Lemma are also presented.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.