Paper detail

The Complexity of Approximate Pattern Matching on De Bruijn Graphs

Aligning a sequence to a walk in a labeled graph is a problem of fundamental importance to Computational Biology. For finding a walk in an arbitrary graph with $|E|$ edges that exactly matches a pattern of length $m$, a lower bound based on the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) implies an algorithm significantly faster than $O(|E|m)$ time is unlikely [Equi et al., ICALP 2019]. However, for many special graphs, such as de Bruijn graphs, the problem can be solved in linear time [Bowe et al., WABI 2012]. For approximate matching, the picture is more complex. When edits (substitutions, insertions, and deletions) are only allowed to the pattern, or when the graph is acyclic, the problem is again solvable in $O(|E|m)$ time. When edits are allowed to arbitrary cyclic graphs, the problem becomes NP-complete, even on binary alphabets [Jain et al., RECOMB 2019]. These results hold even when edits are restricted to only substitutions. The complexity of approximate pattern matching on de Bruijn graphs remained open. We investigate this problem and show that the properties that make de Bruijn graphs amenable to efficient exact pattern matching do not extend to approximate matching, even when restricted to the substitutions only case with alphabet size four. We prove that determining the existence of a matching walk in a de Bruijn graph is NP-complete when substitutions are allowed to the graph. In addition, we demonstrate that an algorithm significantly faster than $O(|E|m)$ is unlikely for de Bruijn graphs in the case where only substitutions are allowed to the pattern. This stands in contrast to pattern-to-text matching where exact matching is solvable in linear time, like on de Bruijn graphs, but approximate matching under substitutions is solvable in subquadratic $O(n\sqrt{m})$ time, where $n$ is the text's length [Abrahamson, SIAM J. Computing 1987].

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.