Paper detail

The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Pairwise-Inverse-Probability and Angular Correction for Fibre Collisions in Clustering Measurements

The completed eBOSS catalogues contain redshifts of 344080 QSOs over 0.8<z<2.2 covering 4808 deg$^2$, 174816 LRGs over 0.6<z<1.0 covering 4242 deg$^2$ and 173736 ELGs over 0.6<z<1.1 covering 1170 deg$^2$ in order to constrain the expansion history of the Universe and the growth rate of structure through clustering measurements. Mechanical limitations of the fibre-fed spectrograph on the Sloan telescope prevent two fibres being placed closer than 62&#34;, the fibre-collision scale, in a single pass of the instrument on the sky. These `fibre collisions&#39; strongly correlate with the intrinsic clustering of targets and can bias measurements of the two-point correlation function resulting in a systematic error on the inferred values of the cosmological parameters. We combine the new techniques of pairwise-inverse-probability weighting and the angular up-weighting to correct the clustering measurements for the effect of fibre collisions. Using mock catalogues we show that our corrections provide unbiased measurements, within data precision, of both the projected correlation function $w_p$ and the multipoles $ξ^l$ of the redshift-space correlation functions down to 0.1Mpc/h, regardless of the tracer type. We apply the corrections to the eBOSS DR16 catalogues. We find that, on scales greater than s~20Mpc/h for $ξ^l$, as used to make BAO and large-scale RSD measurements, approximate methods such as Nearest-Neighbour up-weighting are sufficiently accurate given the statistical errors of the data. Using the PIP method, for the first time for a spectroscopic program of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey we are able to successfully access the 1-halo term in the 3D clustering measurements down to ~0.1Mpc/h scales. Our results will therefore allow studies that use the small-scale clustering measurements to strengthen the constraints on both cosmological parameters and the halo-occupation distribution models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.