Paper detail

The comparison of H2CO(110-111), C18O(1-0) and continuum towards molecular clouds

We present large scale observations of C18O(1-0) towards four massive star forming regions for MON R2, S156, DR17/L906 and M17/M18. The transitions of H2CO(110-111), C18O(1-0) and 6 cm continuum were compared towards the four regions. Analysis of observation and Non--LTE model results shows that the brightness temperature of the formaldehyde absorption line is strongest in background continuum temperature range of about 3 - 8 K. The excitation of the H2CO absorption line is affected by strong background continuum emission. From the comparison of H2CO and C18O maps, we found that the extent of H2CO absorption is broader than that of C18O emission in the four regions. Except for the DR17 region, the H2CO absorption maximum is located at the same position with the C18O peak. The good correlation between intensities and widths of H2CO absorption and C18O emission lines indicate that the H2CO absorption line can trace dense and warm regions of the molecular cloud. Finding that N(H2CO) was well correlated with N(C18O) in the four regions and that the average column density ratio is <H2CO/N(C18O)> ~ 0.03.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.