Paper detail

The comparison of characteristics of pi^{-} mesons produced in central Mg-Mg interactions with the quark gluon string model predictions

A detailed study of pion production in central Mg-Mg collisions at a momentum of 4.3 GeV/c per incident nucleon was carried out with use of the setup GIBS. The average kinematical characteristics of pions (multiplicity n_, momentum P, transverse momentum P_{T}, emission angle Q, rapidity Y) and corresponding distributions have been obtained. The experimental results have been compared with the predictions of the Quark Gluon String Model (QGSM) and satisfactory agreement between the experimental data and the model has been found. The QGSM reproduces also the dependence of average P_{T} on n_{-}. The temperatures of pi^{-} mesons have been estimated in the rapidity interval of 0.5<=Y<=2.1. A satisfactory fit for pi^{-} mesons has been achieved by using a form involving two temperatures T_{1} and T_{2}. It was found that the QGSM underestimates T_{2} by (10-15)%. The data have been analyzed using the transverse momentum technique. The observed dependence of the <P_{x'}(Y)> on Y shows the S-shape behaviour. The slope at midrapidity F had been determined. The QGSM reproduces the <P_{x}> distribution satisfactorily, but underestimates the parameter F.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.