Paper detail

The Compactness of Galaxy Groups in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

We use an updated version of the halo-based galaxy group catalog of Yang et al., and take the surface brightness of the galaxy group ($μ_{\rm lim}$) based on projected positions and luminosities of galaxy members as a compactness proxy to divide groups into sub-systems with different compactness. By comparing various properties, including galaxy conditional luminosity function, stellar population, active galactic nuclei (AGN) activity, and X-ray luminosity of the intra-cluster medium of carefully controlled high (HC) and low compactness (LC) group samples, we find that the group compactness plays an essential role in characterizing the detailed physical properties of the group themselves and their group members, especially for low mass groups with $M_h \lesssim 10^{13.5}h^{-1}M_{\odot}$. We find that the low-mass HC groups have a systematically lower magnitude gap $Δm_{12}$ and X-ray luminosity than their LC counterparts, indicating that the HC groups are probably in the early stage of group merging. On the other hand, a higher fraction of passive galaxies is found in the HC group, which however is a result of systematically smaller halo-centric distance distribution of their satellite population. After controlling of both $M_h$ and halo-centric distance, we do not find any differences for both the quenching faction and AGN activity of the member galaxies between the HC and LC groups. Therefore, we conclude that the halo quenching effect, which result in the halo-centric dependence of galaxy population, is a faster process compared to the dynamical relaxed time-scale of galaxy groups.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.