Paper detail

The combined non-equilibrium diffusion and low Mach number limits of the compressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier-P1 approximation radiation model

In this paper, we investigate the combined non-equilibrium diffusion and low Mach number limits of the compressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier-P1 (NSF-P1) model with general initial data, which arises in the radiation hydrodynamics. Compared to the classical compressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier system, the NSF-P1 model has an asymmetric singular structure caused by the radiation field. To handle these singular terms, we introduce an equivalent pressure and an equivalent velocity to balance the order of singularity and establish the uniform estimates of solutions by designating appropriate weighted norms as well as carrying out delicate energy analysis. We conclude that, for partially general initial data and the strong scattering effect, the NSF-P1 model converges to the system of low Mach number heat-conducting viscous flows coupled with a diffusion equation. We also discuss the variations of the limit equations as the scattering intensity changes. Furthermore, when the scattering effect is sufficiently weak, we can obtain the singular limits of the NSF-P1 model with fully general initial data.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.