Paper detail

The Coma - Leo I Distance Ratio and the Hubble Constant

The diameter - velocity dispersion relation in B, V, and K for three early-type galaxies in the Leo I (M96) group is derived from published photometry and kinematic data. The relations in all three colors have slopes which agree well with those for the Coma cluster. The RMS scatter of the Leo I galaxies in each color is extremely small, consistent with the group's compactness. These relations yield estimates of the Coma-Leo I distance ratio of 9.01 +/- 0.51, 8.77 +/- 0.43, and 8.82 +/- 0.31, respectively, with a weighted mean of 8.84 +/- 0.23. The general agreement among the three colors indicates that the early-type galaxies in Leo I and Coma have similar stellar populations. The Coma-Leo I distance ratio coupled with estimates of the absolute distance to the Leo I group allows the Hubble constant to be determined, free of the uncertainties which arise when working with the Virgo cluster. Several high quality distance estimates are available from a variety of techniques: Cepheids in M96 (Tanvir et al. 1995) and M95 (Graham et al. 1997), surface brightness fluctuations (Tonry et al. 1997), planetary nebulae luminosity functions (Ciardullo et al. 1993), and the luminosity of the red giant branch tip (Sakai, Freedman, & Madore 1996). Adopting a cosmic recession velocity of the Coma cluster in the microwave background frame of 7200 +/- 300 km/s, these distance estimates lead to values of the Hubble constant ranging from 70 to 81 km/s/Mpc, with an unweighted mean of 75 +/- 6 km/s/Mpc.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.