Paper detail

The colour of the Deep ROSAT X-ray sky fluctuations

We have carried out a fluctuation analysis in four bands (R4, R5, R6 and R7 corresponding to 0.44-1.01 keV, 0.56-1.21 keV, 0.73-1.56 keV and to 1.05-2.04 keV respectively) of two very deep ROSAT PSPC observations in directions where the galactic H{\small I} column is minimal. This has enabled us to study the average spectrum of the sources contributing to 0.5-2 keV fluxes $\sim 10^{-15} \rm \ergpcmsqps$. The best fit spectral energy index for the average faint source spectrum, $α=0.95^{+0.10}_{-0.15}$, is still steeper than the one measured for the extragalactic XRB at these energies $α\sim 0.4-0.7$, but flatter than the typical AGN spectral index $α\sim 1-1.5$. This result has allowed us to constrain the existence of a population of sources harder than the AGNs contributing to the source counts at these fluxes. We find that a population of X-ray sources with energy spectral index $α\sim 0.4-0.6$ would contribute $(30\pm 20)$ per cent to the source counts at these fluxes if the rest of them are AGNs with energy spectral index $α\sim 1.2$.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.