Paper detail

The colloidal nature of complex fluids leads to enhanced motility of flagellated bacteria

The natural habitats of microorganisms in the human microbiome and ocean and soil ecosystems are full of colloids and macromolecules, which impart non-Newtonian flow properties drastically affecting the locomotion of swimming microorganisms. Although the low-Reynolds-number hydrodynamics of the swimming of flagellated bacteria in simple Newtonian fluids has been well developed, our understanding of bacterial motility in complex non-Newtonian fluids is still primitive. Even after six decades of research, fundamental questions about the nature and origin of bacterial motility enhancement in polymer solutions are still under debate. Here, we study the motility of flagellated bacteria in colloidal suspensions of varying sizes and volume fractions. We find that bacteria in dilute colloidal suspensions display quantitatively the same motile behaviors as those in dilute polymer solutions, where a universal particle-size-dependent motility enhancement up to 80% is uncovered, accompanied by strong suppression of bacterial wobbling. By virtue of the well-controlled size and the hard-sphere nature of colloids, the finding not only resolves the long-standing controversy over bacterial motility enhancement in complex fluids but also challenges all the existing theories using polymer dynamics to address the swimming of flagellated bacteria in dilute polymer solutions. We further develop a simple physical model incorporating the colloidal nature of complex fluids, which quantitatively explains bacterial wobbling dynamics and mobility enhancement in both colloidal and polymeric fluids. Our study sheds light on the puzzling motile behaviors of bacteria in complex fluids relevant to a wide range of microbiological processes and provides a cornerstone in engineering bacterial swimming in complex environments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.