Paper detail

The Collapsar and Supranova Models

This rapporteur review summarizes results presented in Parallel Session GBT2 (Gamma Ray Burst Theory 2) on the Collapsar and Supranova Models held 25 July 2003 at the 10th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A central issue in GRB studies is the process whereby energy is released from the GRB engine. One scenario is the collapsar model, where the evolved stellar core promptly collapses to a black hole surrounded by a massive, intermittently-accreting torus of nuclear density material. A second scenario is the supranova model, where the first step of a two-step collapse process leaves behind a rapidly rotating neutron star stabilized by rotation, which later collapses to a black hole while making the GRB. In the supranova model, a powerful pulsar wind lasting days to weeks after the supernova makes distinctive signatures from the heating of the supernova remnant (SNR) shell, which should be discovered with Swift. This model also predicts nonstandard reddened excesses from the cooling SNR due to the range of delays between the two collapse events, contrary to observations of SN emissions from low redshift GRBs which favor the collapsar model. The observational basis for both models is critically reviewed. An outline of a GRB model is proposed where the second collapse takes place within minutes to hours after the primary SN event, during which time loss of centrifugal support along the rotation axis of the neutron star provides a relatively baryon-clean polar environment along which a newly formed, rapidly spinning black hole drives collimated baryon-dilute outflows.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.