Paper detail

The cohesive principle and the Bolzano-Weierstraß principle

The aim of this paper is to determine the logical and computational strength of instances of the Bolzano-Weierstraß principle (BW) and a weak variant of it. We show that BW is instance-wise equivalent to the weak König's lemma for $Σ^0_1$-trees ($Σ^0_1$-WKL). This means that from every bounded sequence of reals one can compute an infinite $Σ^0_1$-0/1-tree, such that each infinite branch of it yields an accumulation point and vice versa. Especially, this shows that the degrees d >> 0' are exactly those containing an accumulation point for all bounded computable sequences. Let BW_weak be the principle stating that every bounded sequence of real numbers contains a Cauchy subsequence (a sequence converging but not necessarily fast). We show that BW_weak is instance-wise equivalent to the (strong) cohesive principle (StCOH) and - using this - obtain a classification of the computational and logical strength of BW_weak. Especially we show that BW_weak does not solve the halting problem and does not lead to more than primitive recursive growth. Therefore it is strictly weaker than BW. We also discuss possible uses of BW_weak.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.