Paper detail

The CNOC2 sample of intermediate redshift galaxy groups - the powerhouse of galaxy evolution

The evolution of galaxies in groups may have important implications for the global evolution of star formation rate in the Universe, since many processes which operate in groups may suppress star formation, and the fraction of galaxies bound in groups at the present day is as high as ~60%. We present an analysis of our sample of 0.3<=z<=0.55 groups, selected from the CNOC2 redshift survey and supplemented with deep spectroscopy and HST ACS imaging. We find that these groups contain significantly more passive galaxies than the field, with excesses of S0, elliptical and passive spiral galaxy types. The morphological composition is closely matched to that of more massive irregular clusters at a similar epoch. Contrasting with galaxy samples in a variety of environments and epochs, we find that the fraction of passive galaxies (EW[OII]<5A), is strongly evolving in the group environment, with parallel evolution in the (global) field population, whilst little evolution is observed in cluster cores since z~1.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.