Paper detail

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Signs of neutrino mass in current cosmological datasets

We investigate the cosmological implications of the latest growth of structure measurement from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) CMASS Data Release 11 with particular focus on the sum of the neutrino masses, $\sum m_ν$. We examine the robustness of the cosmological constraints from the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) scale, the Alcock-Paczynski effect and redshift-space distortions ($D_V/r_s$, $F_{\rm AP}$, $fσ_8$) of \citet{Beutler:2013b}, when introducing a neutrino mass in the power spectrum template. We then discuss how the neutrino mass relaxes discrepancies between the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and other low-redshift measurements within $Λ$CDM. Combining our cosmological constraints with WMAP9 yields $\sum m_ν = 0.36\pm0.14\,$eV ($68\%$ c.l.), which represents a $2.6σ$ preference for non-zero neutrino mass. The significance can be increased to $3.3σ$ when including weak lensing results and other BAO constraints, yielding $\sum m_ν = 0.35\pm0.10\,$eV ($68\%$ c.l.). However, combining CMASS with Planck data reduces the preference for neutrino mass to $\sim 2σ$. When removing the CMB lensing effect in the Planck temperature power spectrum (by marginalising over $A_{\rm L}$), we see shifts of $\sim 1σ$ in $σ_8$ and $Ω_m$, which have a significant effect on the neutrino mass constraints. In case of CMASS plus Planck without the $A_{\rm L}$-lensing signal, we find a preference for a neutrino mass of $\sum m_ν = 0.34\pm 0.14\,$eV ($68\%$ c.l.), in excellent agreement with the WMAP9+CMASS value. The constraint can be tightened to $3.4σ$ yielding $\sum m_ν = 0.36\pm 0.10\,$eV ($68\%$ c.l.) when weak lensing data and other BAO constraints are included.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access15 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.