Paper detail

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Testing gravity with redshift-space distortions using the power spectrum multipoles

We analyse the anisotropic clustering of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) CMASS Data Release 11 (DR11) sample, which consists of $690\,827$ galaxies in the redshift range $0.43 < z < 0.7$ and has a sky coverage of $8\,498\,\text{deg}^2$. We perform our analysis in Fourier space using a power spectrum estimator suggested by Yamamoto et al. (2006). We measure the multipole power spectra in a self-consistent manner for the first time in the sense that we provide a proper way to treat the survey window function and the integral constraint, without the commonly used assumption of an isotropic power spectrum and without the need to split the survey into sub-regions. The main cosmological signals exploited in our analysis are the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the signal of redshift space distortions, both of which are distorted by the Alcock-Paczynski effect. Together, these signals allow us to constrain the distance ratio $D_V(z_{\rm eff})/r_s(z_d) = 13.89\pm 0.18$, the Alcock-Paczynski parameter $F_{\rm AP}(z_{\rm eff}) = 0.679\pm0.031$ and the growth rate of structure $f(z_{\rm eff})σ_8(z_{\rm eff}) = 0.419\pm0.044$ at the effective redshift $z_{\rm eff}=0.57$. We did not find significant systematic uncertainties for $D_V/r_s$ or $F_{\rm AP}$ but include a systematic error for $fσ_8$ of $3.1\%$. Combining our dataset with Planck to test General Relativity (GR) through the simple $γ$-parameterisation, reveals a $\sim 2σ$ tension between the data and the prediction by GR. The tension between our result and GR can be traced back to a tension in the clustering amplitude $σ_8$ between CMASS and Planck.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access18 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.