Paper detail

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: weighing the neutrino mass using the galaxy power spectrum of the CMASS sample

We measure the sum of the neutrino particle masses using the three-dimensional galaxy power spectrum of the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) Data Release 9 (DR9) CMASS galaxy sample. Combined with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), supernova (SN) and additional baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) data, we find upper 95 percent confidence limits of the neutrino mass $Σm_ν<0.340$ eV within a flat $Λ$CDM background, and $Σm_ν<0.821$ eV, assuming a more general background cosmological model. The number of neutrino species is measured to be $N_{\rm eff}=4.308\pm0.794$ and $N_{\rm eff}=4.032^{+0.870}_{-0.894}$ for these two cases respectively. We study and quantify the effect of several factors on the neutrino measurements, including the galaxy power spectrum bias model, the effect of redshift-space distortion, the cutoff scale of the power spectrum, and the choice of additional data. The impact of neutrinos with unknown masses on other cosmological parameter measurements is investigated. The fractional matter density and the Hubble parameter are measured to be $Ω_M=0.2796\pm0.0097$, $H_0=69.72^{+0.90}_{-0.91}$ km/s/Mpc (flat $Λ$CDM) and $Ω_M=0.2798^{+0.0132}_{-0.0136}$, $H_0=73.78^{+3.16}_{-3.17}$ km/s/Mpc (more general background model). Based on a Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrisation of the equation-of-state $w$ of dark energy, we find that $w=-1$ is consistent with observations, even allowing for neutrinos. Similarly, the curvature Ω_K and the running of the spectral index $α_s$ are both consistent with zero. The tensor-to-scaler ratio is constrained down to $r<0.198$ (95 percent CL, flat $Λ$ CDM) and $r<0.440$ (95 percent CL, more general background model).

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access18 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.