Paper detail

The Clustering Evolution of Dusty Star-Forming Galaxies

We present predictions for the clustering of galaxies selected by their emission at far infra-red (FIR) and sub-millimetre wavelengths. This includes the first predictions for the effect of clustering biases induced by the coarse angular resolution of single-dish telescopes at these wavelengths. We combine a new version of the GALFORM model of galaxy formation with a self-consistent model for calculating the absorption and re-emission of radiation by interstellar dust. Model galaxies selected at $850$ $μ$m reside in dark matter halos of mass $M_{\rm halo}\sim10^{11.5}-10^{12}$ $h^{-1}$ M$_{\odot}$, independent of redshift (for $0.2\lesssim z\lesssim4$) or flux (for $0.25\lesssim S_{850μ\rm m}\lesssim4$ mJy). At $z\sim2.5$, the brightest galaxies ($S_{850μ\rm m}>4$ mJy) exhibit a correlation length of $r_{0}=5.5_{-0.5}^{+0.3}$ $h^{-1}$ Mpc, consistent with observations. We show that these galaxies have descendants with stellar masses $M_{\star}\sim10^{11}$ $h^{-1}$ M$_{\odot}$ occupying halos spanning a broad range in mass $M_{\rm halo}\sim10^{12}-10^{14}$ $h^{-1}$ M$_{\odot}$. The FIR emissivity at shorter wavelengths ($250$, $350$ and $500$ $μ$m) is also dominated by galaxies in the halo mass range $M_{\rm halo}\sim10^{11.5}-10^{12}$ $h^{-1}$ M$_{\odot}$, again independent of redshift (for $0.5\lesssim z\lesssim5$). We compare our predictions for the angular power spectrum of cosmic infra-red background anisotropies at these wavelengths with observations, finding agreement to within a factor of $\sim2$ over all scales and wavelengths, an improvement over earlier versions of the model. Simulating images at $850$ $μ$m, we show that confusion effects boost the measured angular correlation function on all scales by a factor of $\sim4$. This has important consequences, potentially leading to inferred halo masses being overestimated by an order of magnitude.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.