Paper detail

The Cluster Distribution as a Test for Dark Matter Models. II: The Dipole Structure

We study the dipole for a redshift sample of Abell/ACO clusters. To elucidate the constraints it places on dark matter models, we use numerical simulations based on the Zel'dovich approximation. We run 20 realizations of each of six different dark matter models: four of these have a density parameter $Ω_0=1$, while the other two have $Ω_0=0.2$, one with and one without a cosmological constant term. For the Abell/ACO sample, we evaluate the parameter $β=Ω_0^{0.6}/b_{ cl}$, which reaches its asymptotic value at $R=160 Mpc/h$. We find $β=0.15\pm 0.04$ and $0.25\pm 0.06$ in LG and CMB frames respectively. After identifying in the simulations LG-like observers, we construct mock cluster samples. We find that an alignment between the cluster dipole and observer velocity, such as that observed (about 20 degrees) should not be expected necessarily in the simulations. This, together with the large observer-to-observer variance estimates of $β$, makes it difficult to place any firm constraints on cosmological models. Our results demonstrate that the large amplitude and convergence depth of the cluster dipole cannot be taken as strong evidence either for or against a low--density Universe.

preprint1995arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.