Paper detail

The Clump Mass Function of the Dense Clouds in the Carina Nebula Complex

We want to characterize the properties of the cold dust clumps in the Carina Nebula Complex (CNC), which shows a very high level of massive star feedback. We derive the Clump Mass Function (ClMF), explore the reliability of different clump extraction algorithms, and investigate the influence of the temperatures within the clouds on the resulting shape of the ClMF. We analyze a 1.25x1.25 deg^2 wide-field sub-mm map obtained with LABOCA (APEX), which provides the first spatially complete survey of the clouds in the CNC. We use the three clump-finding algorithms CLUMPFIND (CF), GAUSSCLUMPS (GC) and SExtractor (SE) to identify individual clumps and determine their total fluxes. In addition to assuming a common `typical' temperature for all clouds, we also employ an empirical relation between cloud column densities and temperature to determine an estimate of the individual clump temperatures, and use this to determine individual clump masses. While the ClMF based on the CF extraction is very well described by a power-law, the ClMFs based on GC and SE are better represented by a log-normal distribution. We also find that the use of individual clump temperatures leads to a shallower ClMF slope than the assumption of a common temperature (e.g. 20 K) of all clumps. The power-law of dN/dM \propto M^-1.95 we find for the CF sample is in good agreement with ClMF slopes found in previous studies of other regions. The dependence of the ClMF shape (power-law vs. log-normal distribution) on the employed extraction method suggests that observational determinations of the ClMF shape yields only very limited information about the true structure of the cloud. Interpretations of log-normal ClMF shape as a signature of turbulent pre-stellar clouds vs. power-law ClMFs as a signature of star-forming clouds may be taken with caution for a single extraction algorithm without additional information.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.