Paper detail

The CIV Baldwin effect in QSOs from Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Using the properties of SDSS DR7 QSOs catalog from Shen et al., the Baldwin effect, its slope evolution, the underlying drive for a large sample of 35019 QSOs with reliable spectral analysis are investigated. We find that the Baldwin effect exists in this large QSOs sample, which is almost the same in 11 different redshift bins, up to $z\sim 5$. The slope is -0.238 by the BCES (\civ\ EW depends on the continuum), -0.787 by the BCES bisector. For 11 redshift-bins, there is an increasing of the Baldwin effect slope from $z\sim1.5$ to $z\sim2.0$. From $z\sim2.0$ to $z\sim5.0$, the slope change is not clear considering their uncertainties or larger redshift bins. There is a strong correlation between the rest-frame \civ\ EW and \civ-based \mbh while the relation between the \civ\ EW and \mgii-based \mbh is very weak. With the correction of \civ-based \mbh from the \civ\ blueshift relative to \mgii, we suggest that this strong correlation is due to the bias of the \civ-based \mbh, with respect to that from the \mgii\ line. Considering the \mgii-based \mbh, a medium strong correlation is found between the \civ\ EW and the Eddington ratio, which implies that the Eddington ratio seems to be a better underlying physical parameter than the central black hole mass.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.