Paper detail

The CIB-lensing bispectrum: impact on primordial non-Gaussianity and detectability for the Planck mission

We characterize the Cosmic Infrared Background (CIB)-lensing bispectrum which is one of the contributions to the three-point functions of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) maps in harmonic space. We show that the CIB-lensing bispectrum has a considerable strength and that it can be detected with high significance in the Planck high-frequency maps. We also present forecasts of the contamination on different shapes of the primordial non-Gaussianity $f_{nl}$ parameter produced by the CIB-lensing bispectrum and by the extragalactic point sources bispectrum in the Planck high-resolution CMB anisotropy maps. The local, equilateral and orthogonal shapes are considered for 'raw' single-frequency (i.e., without applying any component separation technique) and foreground-reduced Planck temperature maps. The CIB-lensing correlation seems to mainly affect orthogonal shapes of the bispectrum - with Δ$f_{nl}$ = -21 and -88 for the 143 and 217 GHz bands respectively - while point sources mostly impact equilateral shapes, with Δ$f_{nl}$ = 160, 54 and 60 at 100, 143 and 217 GHz. However, the results indicate that these contaminants do not induce any relevant bias on Planck $f_{nl}$ estimates when foreground-reduced maps are considered: using SEVEM for the component separation we obtain Δ$f_{nl}$ = 10.5 due to the CIB-lensing and Δ$f_{nl}$ = 30.4 due to point sources, corresponding to 0.30σ and 0.45σ in terms of the Planck 2013 $f_{nl}$ uncertainty. The component separation technique is, in fact, able to partially clean the extragalactic source contamination and the bias is reduced for all the shapes. We have further developed single- and multiple-frequency estimators based on the Komatsu, Spergel & Wandelt (2005) formalism that can be implemented to efficiently detect this signal.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.