Paper detail

The Chromatin Organization of an Eukaryotic Genome : Sequence Specific+ Statistical=Combinatorial (Extended Abstract)

Nucleosome organization in eukaryotic genomes has a deep impact on gene function. Although progress has been recently made in the identification of various concurring factors influencing nucleosome positioning, it is still unclear whether nucleosome positions are sequence dictated or determined by a random process. It has been postulated for a long time that,in the proximity of TSS, a barrier determines the position of the +1 nucleosome and then geometric constraints alter the random positioning process determining nucleosomal phasing. Such a pattern fades out as one moves away from the barrier to become again a random positioning process. Although this statistical model is widely accepted,the molecular nature of the barrier is still unknown. Moreover,we are far from the identification of a set of sequence rules able:to account for the genome-wide nucleosome organization;to explain the nature of the barriers on which the statistical mechanism hinges;to allow for a smooth transition from sequence-dictated to statistical positioning and back. We show that sequence complexity,quantified via various methods, can be the rule able to at least partially account for all the above.In particular, we have conducted our analyses on 4 high resolution nucleosomal maps of the model eukaryotes and found that nucleosome depleted regions can be well distinguished from nucleosome enriched regions by sequence complexity measures.In particular, (a) the depleted regions are less complex than the enriched ones, (b) around TSS complexity measures alone are in striking agreement with in vivo nucleosome occupancy,in particular precisely indicating the positions of the +1 and -1 nucleosomes. Those findings indicate that the intrinsic richness of subsequences within sequences plays a role in nucleosomal formation in genomes, and that sequence complexity constitutes the molecular nature of nucleosome barrier.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.