Paper detail

The Characteristic Star Formation Histories of Galaxies at Redshifts z~2-7

A large sample of spectroscopically confirmed galaxies at 1.4<z<3.7, with complementary imaging in the near- and mid-IR from the ground and from Hubble and Spitzer, is used to infer the average star formation histories (SFHs) of typical galaxies from z~7 to 2. For a subset of 302 galaxies at 1.5<z<2.6, we perform a comparison of star formation rates (SFRs) determined from SED modeling (SFRs[SED]) and those calculated from deep Keck UV and Spitzer/MIPS 24 micron imaging (SFRs[IR+UV]). Exponentially declining SFHs yield SFRs[SED] that are 5-10x lower on average than SFRs[IR+UV], indicating that declining SFHs may not be accurate for typical galaxies at z>2. The SFRs of z~2-3 galaxies are directly proportional to their stellar masses M*, with unity slope---a result that is confirmed with Spitzer/IRAC stacks of 1179 UV-faint (R>25.5) galaxies---for M*>5e8 Msun and SFRs >2 Msun/yr. We interpret this result in the context of several systematic biases that can affect determinations of the SFR-M* relation. The average specific SFRs at z~2-3 are similar within a factor of two to those measured at z>4, implying an average SFH where SFRs increase with time. A consequence of these rising SFHs is that (a) a substantial fraction of UV-bright z~2-3 galaxies had faint sub-L* progenitors at z>4; and (b) gas masses must increase with time from z=7 to 2, over which time the net cold gas accretion rate---as inferred from the specific SFR and the Kennicutt-Schmidt relation---is ~2-3x larger than the SFR . However, if we evolve to higher redshift the SFHs and masses of the halos that are expected to host L* galaxies at z~2, we find that <10% of the baryons accreted onto typical halos at z>4 actually contribute to star formation at those epochs. These results highlight the relative inefficiency of star formation even at early cosmic times when galaxies were first assembling. [Abridged]

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.