Paper detail

The Chandra Deep Field-North Survey. XIV. X-ray detected Obscured AGNs and Starburst Galaxies in the Bright Submm Source Population

We provide X-ray constraints and perform the first X-ray spectral analyses for bright (f_850>=5mJy; S/N>=4) SCUBA sources in an 8.4'x8.4' area of the 2 Ms Chandra Deep Field-North survey containing the Hubble Deep Field-North. X-ray emission is detected from 7 of the 10 bright submm sources in this region, corresponding to an X-ray detected submm source density of ~360 deg^-2 (>~36% of the bright submm source population). Two of the X-ray detected sources have nearby (within 3") X-ray companions, suggesting merging/interacting sources or gravitational lensing effects, and 3 lie within the approximate extent of a proto-cluster candidate. Five of the X-ray detected sources have flat X-ray spectral slopes, suggesting obscured AGN activity. X-ray spectral analyses suggest that one of these AGNs may be a Compton-thick source; of the other 4 AGNs, 3 appear to be Compton-thin sources and one has poor constraints. The rest-frame unabsorbed X-ray luminosities of these AGNs are more consistent with those of Seyfert galaxies than QSOs. Thus, the low X-ray detection rate of bright submm sources by moderately deep X-ray surveys appears to be due to the relatively low luminosities of the AGNs rather than Compton-thick absorption. A comparison of these sources to the well-studied heavily obscured AGN NGC6240 shows that the average AGN contribution is negligible at submm wavelengths. The X-ray properties of the other 2 X-ray detected sources are consistent with those expected from luminous star formation; however, we cannot rule out the possibility that low-luminosity AGNs are present. The 3 X-ray undetected sources appear to lie at high redshift (z>4) and could be either AGNs or starbust galaxies.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.