Abstract

We use a sample of 27 GRBs at redshift z=2−6z=2-6 to probe the outflows in their respective host galaxies (log(M∗/M⊙) ∼ 9−11\mathrm{log(M_*/M_{\odot})}~\sim~9-11) and search for possible relations between the outflow properties and those of the host galaxies such as M∗\mathrm{M_*}, SFR, and specific SFR. First, we consider three outflow properties −- outflow column density (Nout\mathrm{N_{out}}), maximum outflow velocity (Vmax\mathrm{V_{max}}), and normalized maximum velocity (Vnorm\mathrm{V_{norm}} = Vmax/Vcirc,halo\mathrm{V_{max}/V_{circ, halo}}, where Vcirc,halo\mathrm{V_{circ,halo}} is the halo circular velocity). We observe clear trends of Nout\mathrm{N_{out}} and Vmax\mathrm{V_{max}} with increasing SFR in high-ion-traced outflows, with a stronger (> 3σ>~3σ) Vmax−\mathrm{V_{max}}-SFR correlation. We find that the estimated mass outflow rate and momentum flux of the high-ion outflows scale with SFR and can be supported by the momentum imparted by star formation (supernovae and stellar winds). The kinematic correlations of high-ion-traced outflows with SFR are similar to those observed for star-forming galaxies at low redshifts. The correlations with SFR are weaker in low-ions. This, along with the lower detection fraction in low-ions, indicates that the outflow is primarily high-ion dominated. We also observe a strong (> 3σ>~3σ) trend of normalized velocity (Vnorm\mathrm{V_{norm}}) decreasing with halo mass and increasing with sSFR, suggesting that outflows from low-mass halos and high-sSFR galaxies are most likely to escape and enrich the outer CGM and IGM with metals. By comparing the CGM-GRB stacks with those of starbursts at z∼2z\sim2 and z∼0.1z\sim0.1, we find that over a broad redshift range, the outflow strength strongly depends on the main-sequence offset at the respective redshifts rather than simply the SFR.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.