Paper detail

The cavity method for minority games between arbitrageurs on financial markets

We use the cavity method from statistical physics for analyzing the transient and stationary dynamics of a minority game that is played by agents performing market arbitrage. On the level of linear response the method allows to include the reaction of the market to individual actions of the agents as well as the reaction of the agents to individual information items of the market. This way we derive a self-consistent solution to the minority game. In particular we analyze the impact of general nonlinear price functions on the amount of arbitrage if noise from external fluctuations is present. We identify the conditions under which arbitrage gets reduced due to the presence of noise. When the cavity method is extended to time dependent response of the market price to previous actions of the agents, the individual contributions of noise can be pursued over different time scales in the transient dynamics until a stationary state is reached and when the stationary state is reached. The contributions are from external fluctuations in price and information and from noise due to the choice of strategies. The dynamics explains the time evolution of scores of the agents' strategies: it changes from initially a random walk to non-Markovian dynamics and bounded excursions on an intermediate time scale to effectively random switching in the choice between strategies on long time scales. In contrast to the Curie-Weiss level of a mean-field approach, the market response included by the cavity method captures the realistic feature that the agents can have a preference for a certain choice of strategies without getting stuck to a single choice. The breakdown of the method in the phase transition region indicates possible market mechanisms leading to critical volatility and a possible regime shift.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.