Paper detail

The Cauchy problem for the fast $p-$Laplacian evolution equation. Characterization of the global Harnack principle and fine asymptotic behaviour

We study fine global properties of nonnegative solutions to the Cauchy Problem for the fast $p$-Laplacian evolution equation $u_t=Δ_p u$ on the whole Euclidean space, in the so-called &#34;good fast diffusion range&#34; $\tfrac{2N}{N+1}<p<2$. It is well-known that non-negative solutions behave for large times as $\mathcal{B}$, the Barenblatt (or fundamental) solution, which has an explicit expression. We prove the so-called Global Harnack Principle (GHP), that is, precise global pointwise upper and lower estimates of nonnegative solutions in terms of $\mathcal{B}$. This can be considered the nonlinear counterpart of the celebrated Gaussian estimates for the linear heat equation. We characterize the maximal (hence optimal) class of initial data such that the GHP holds, by means of an integral tail condition, easy to check. The GHP is then used as a tool to analyze the fine asymptotic behavior for large times. For initial data that satisfy the same integral condition, we prove that the corresponding solutions behave like the Barenblatt with the same mass, uniformly in relative error. When the integral tail condition is not satisfied we show that both the GHP and the uniform convergence in relative error, do not hold anymore, and we provide also explicit counterexamples. We then prove a &#34;generalized GHP&#34;, that is, pointwise upper and lower bounds in terms of explicit profiles with a tail different from $\mathcal{B}$. Finally, we derive sharp global quantitative upper bounds of the modulus of the gradient of the solution, and, when data are radially decreasing, we show uniform convergence in relative error for the gradients. To the best of our knowledge, analogous issues for the linear heat equation $p=2$, do not possess such clear answers, only partial results are known.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.