Paper detail

The case for jets in cataclysmic variables

For decades cataclysmic variables (CVs) were thought to be one of the few classes of accreting compact objects to not launch jets, and have consequently been used to constrain jet launching models. However, recent theoretical and observational advances indicate that CVs do in fact launch jets. Specifically, it was demonstrated that their accretion-outflow cycle is analogous to that of their higher mass cousins -- the X-ray Binaries (XRBs). Subsequent observations of the CV SS Cygni confirmed this and have consistently shown radio flaring equivalent to that in the XRBs that marks a transient jet. Based on this finding and the emission properties, several studies have concluded that the radio emission is most likely from a transient jet. Observations of other CVs, while not conclusive, are consistent with this interpretation. However, the issue is not yet settled. Later observations have raised a number of questions about this model, as well as about potential alternative radio emission mechanisms. CVs are non-relativistic and many have well-determined distances; these properties would make them ideal candidates with which to address many of our outstanding questions about fundamental jet physics. Here we review the case for jets in CVs, discuss the outstanding questions and issues, and outline the future work necessary to conclusively answer the question of whether CVs launch jets.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.