Paper detail

The Case for a Publicly Available, Well-Instrumented GBT Operating at 20-115 GHz

A well-instrumented Green Bank Telescope (GBT) operating at high frequency represents a unique scientific resource for the US community. As a filled-aperture, 100m-diameter telescope, the GBT is ideally suited to fast mapping of extended, low surface brightness emission with excellent instantaneous frequency coverage. This capability makes the GBT a key facility for a range of cutting edge science described in this document, only possible at these frequencies. We note that the ability to perform the necessary observations is unique and highly complementary to the capabilities offered by interferometers, and should be preserved. We argue that rather than divesting from this exceptional resource, it makes sense for the US community to invest moderately to maintain GBT operations and to instrument it in an optimal manner, enabling it to become an extraordinary complement to existing and future radio interferometers. Adequately instrumented, the GBT would be a pillar for 20-115 GHz science in the US and the world.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access19 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.