Paper detail

The Case for a Low Mass Black Hole in the Low Mass X-ray Binary V1408 Aquilae (= 4U 1957+115)

There are very few confirmed black holes with a mass that could be $\sim\! 4\, M_\odot$ and no neutron stars with masses greater than $\sim\! 2\, M_\odot$, creating a gap in the observed distribution of compact star masses. Some black holes with masses between 2 and $4\, M_\odot$ might be hiding among other X-ray sources, whose masses are difficult to measure. We present new high-speed optical photometry of the low-mass X-ray binary V1408 Aql (= 4U 1957+115), which is a persistent X-ray source thought to contain a black hole. The optical light curve of V1408~Aql shows a nearly sinusoidal modulation at the orbital period of the system superimposed on large night-to-night variations in mean intensity. We combined the new photometry with previously-published photometry to derive a more precise orbital period, $P = 0.388893(3)$\ d, and to better define the orbital light curve and night-to-night variations. The orbital light curve agrees well with a model in which the modulation is caused entirely by the changing aspect of the heated face of the secondary star. The lack of eclipses rules out orbital inclinations greater than $65^{\circ}$. Our best models for the orbital light curve favor inclinations near $13^{\circ}$ and black hole masses near $3\, M_\odot$ with a 90\% upper bound of $6.2\, M_\odot$, and a lower bound of $2.0\, M_\odot$ imposed solely by the maximum mass of neutron stars. We favor a black hole primary over a neutron star primary based on evidence from the X-ray spectra, the high spin of the compact object, and the fact that a type I X-ray burst has not been observed for this system. Although uncertainties in the data and the models allow higher masses, possibly much higher masses, the compact star in V1408~Aql is a viable candidate for a black hole lying in the mass gap.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.