Paper detail

The carbon star IRAS 15194-5115: Circumstellar CO radio and FIR rotational lines

We have modelled radio and far-infrared rotational lines of 12^CO and 13^CO obtained from the circumstellar envelope of the infrared-bright carbon star IRAS 15194-5115. Eleven rotational lines between J=1-0 and 21-20 and nine rotational lines between J=1-0 and 22-21 in the ground vibrational states of 12^CO and 13^CO, respectively, provide the observational constraints. A model of the circumstellar envelope with a constant mass-loss rate (1 10^-5Msun/yr) and 12^CO/13^CO-ratio (5.5) is consistent with our observed FIR and radio data, suggesting that the wind characteristics have not changed significantly over the past few thousand years. Thus, IRAS 15194-5115 appears to be a highly evolved AGB-star, but the carbon star properties combined with the inferred low 12^C/13^C-ratio make the evolutionary status of this star uncertain. It may have been a J-star for which the 12^C}/13^C-ratio has remained low, or it may be a star of 5 to 8 solar masses, which has recently become a carbon star due to quenching of hot bottom burning. The dust properties or the relative amount of dust in the envelope appear to be different from those in the envelope of the well known carbon star IRC+10 216.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.