Paper detail

The carbon cost of a PhD in solar cell materials

Scientific research can bring about important progress in developing renewable energy technology such as solar cells. However, in addition to positive impact, research also comes at a cost, and one such cost is the CO$_2$ footprint associated with doing research and producing technologies. Here, as an example of such a cost, I estimate the associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with my PhD, in which I researched computational and experimental design of thin film materials for photovoltaics. I consider supercomputer power, synchrotron beam time, laboratory synthesis and characterization, travel associated with research, and personal emissions over the course of my PhD. This analysis demonstrates that doing science increases my carbon footprint to much higher than an average American. Because our consumption is so high, scientists have a moral imperative to reduce our own emissions in our laboratories and in the technologies we create.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.