Paper detail

The candidacy of shuffle and shear during compound twinning in hexagonal close-packed structures

This paper proposes a systematic generalized formulation for calculating both atomic shuffling and shear candidates for a given compound twinning mode in hexagonal closed-packed metals. Although shuffles play an important role in the mobility of twinning dislocations in non-Bravais metallic lattices, their analytical expressions have not been previously derived. The method is illustrated for both flat planes and corrugated planes which are exemplified by {11-22} and {10-12} twinning modes, respectively. The method distinguishes between shuffle displacements and net shuffles. While shuffle displacements correspond to movements between ideal atom positions in the parent and twin lattices, net shuffles comprise contributions from shear on overlying planes which can operate along opposite directions to those of shuffle displacements. Thus, net shuffles in the twinning direction can vanish in a limiting case, as is interestingly the case for those needed in the second plane by the b_4 dislocation candidate in {11-22} twinning. It is found that while shuffle displacement vectors can be irrational when K_1 is corrugated, net shuffle vectors are always rational.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.