Paper detail

The C+N+O abundances and the splitting of the subgiant branch in the Globular Cluster NGC 1851

Among the newly discovered features of multiple stellar populations in Globular Clusters, the cluster NGC 1851 harbours a double subgiant branch, that can be explained in terms of two stellar generations, only slightly differing in age, the younger one having an increased total C+N+O abundance. Thanks to this difference in the chemistry, a fit can be made to the subgiant branches, roughly consistent with the C+N+O abundance variations already discovered two decades ago, and confirmed by recent spectroscopic data. We compute theoretical isochrones for the main sequence turnoff, by adopting four chemical mixtures for the opacities and nuclear reaction rates. The standard mixture has Z=10$^{-3}$ and [$α$/Fe]=0.4, the others have C+N+O respectively equal to 2, 3 and 5 times the standard mixture, according to the element abundance distribution described in the text. We compare tracks and isochrones, and show how the results depend on the total CNO abundance. We notice that different initial CNO abundances between two clusters, otherwise similar in metallicity and age, may lead to differences in the turnoff morphology that can be easily attributed to an age difference. We simulate the main sequence and subgiant branch data for NGC 1851 and show that an increase of C+N+O by a factor $\sim$3 best reproduces the shift between the subgiant branches. We compare the main sequence width in the color m$_{F336W}$-m$_{F814W}$ with models, and find that the maximum helium abundance compatible with the data is Y$\simeq$0.29. We consider the result in the framework of the formation of the second stellar generation in globular clusters, for the bulk of which we estimate a helium abundance of Y$\simlt 0.26$.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.