Paper detail

The c equivalence principle and the correct form of writing Maxwell's equations

It is well-known that the speed $c_u=1/\sqrt{ε_0μ_0}$ is obtained in the process of defining SI units via action-at-a-distance forces, like the force between two static charges and the force between two long and parallel currents. The speed $c_u$ is then physically different from the observed speed of propagation $c$ associated with electromagnetic waves in vacuum. However, repeated experiments have led to the numerical equality $c_u=c,$ which we have called the $c$ equivalence principle. In this paper we point out that $\nabla\times{\bf E}=-[1/(ε_0μ_0 c^2)]\partial{\bf B}/\partial t$ is the correct form of writing Faraday's law when the $c$ equivalence principle is not assumed. We also discuss the covariant form of Maxwell's equations without assuming the $c$ equivalence principle.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.