Paper detail

The $c$-differential behavior of the inverse function under the $EA$-equivalence

While the classical differential uniformity ($c=1$) is invariant under the CCZ-equivalence, the newly defined \cite{EFRST20} concept of $c$-differential uniformity, in general is not invariant under EA or CCZ-equivalence, as was observed in \cite{SPRS20}. In this paper, we find an intriguing behavior of the inverse function, namely, that adding some appropriate linearized monomials increases the $c$-differential uniformity significantly, for some~$c$. For example, adding the linearized monomial $x^{p^d}$, where $d$ is the largest nontrivial divisor of $n$, increases the mentioned $c$-differential uniformity from~$2$ or $3$ (for $c\neq 0$) to $\geq p^{d}+2$, which in the case of AES' inverse function on $\F_{2^8}$ is a significant value of~$18$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.