Paper detail

The Broad Line Region in NGC 4051: An Inflow Illuminated by a 10^5 K Accretion Disk

Adopting a spherically symmetric steady-state ballistic inflow as the kinematic model for the gas distribution responsible for producing the Hα emission line and a central black hole (BH) mass of 1.7 x10^6 M_sun, determined from prior reverberation mapping, leads to the following dimensions for the size of the broad line region (BLR) in NGC 4051; an inner radius ~3 lt-days and a lower limit to the outer radius ~ 475 lt-days. Thus, the previously determined reverberation size for the BLR marks just the inner radius of a much larger volume of ionized gas. The number of ionizing photons required to sustain the Hα emission line luminosity exceeds the number observed to be available from the central AGN by a factor of 3 - 4. Such a large ionizing deficit can be reconciled if the BLR is ionized by a 10^5 K accretion disk that is hidden from direct view by the high opacity of intervening H gas. A new definition is introduced for the ionization parameter that acknowledges the fact that H opacity significantly attenuates the flux of ionizing photons in the large, partially ionized, nebula surrounding the AGN. Collectively, these results have important implications for BH masses estimated using reverberation radii and the structure of the BLR inferred from velocity-delay maps.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.