Paper detail

The brightest galaxies at Cosmic Dawn

Recent JWST observations suggest an excess of $z\gtrsim10$ galaxy candidates above most theoretical models. Here, we explore how the interplay between halo formation timescales, star formation efficiency and dust attenuation affects the properties and number densities of galaxies we can detect in the early universe. We calculate the theoretical upper limit on the UV luminosity function, assuming star formation is 100% efficient and all gas in halos is converted into stars, and that galaxies are at the peak age for UV emission (~10 Myr). This upper limit is ~4 orders of magnitude greater than current observations, implying these are fully consistent with star formation in $Λ$CDM cosmology. In a more realistic model, we use the distribution of halo formation timescales derived from extended Press-Schechter theory as a proxy for star formation rate (SFR). We predict that the galaxies observed so far at $z\gtrsim10$ are dominated by those with the fastest formation timescales, and thus most extreme SFRs and young ages. These galaxies can be upscattered by ~1.5 mag compared to the median UV magnitude vs halo mass relation. This likely introduces a selection effect at high redshift whereby only the youngest ($\lesssim$10 Myr), most highly star forming galaxies (specific SFR$\gtrsim$30 Gyr$^{-1}$) have been detected so far. Furthermore, our modelling suggests that redshift evolution at the bright end of the UV luminosity function is substantially affected by the build-up of dust attenuation. We predict that deeper JWST observations (reaching m~30) will reveal more typical galaxies with relatively older ages (~100 Myr) and less extreme specific SFRs (~10 Gyr$^{-1}$ for a $M_\mathrm{UV}$ ~ -20 galaxy at z~10).

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.