Paper detail

The boundary-Wecken classification of surfaces

Let X be a compact 2-manifold with nonempty boundary dX and let f: (X, dX) --> (X, dX) be a boundary-preserving map. Denote by MF_d[f] the minimum number of fixed point among all boundary-preserving maps that are homotopic through boundary-preserving maps to f. The relative Nielsen number N_d(f) is the sum of the number of essential fixed point classes of the restriction f-bar : dX --> dX and the number of essential fixed point classes of f that do not contain essential fixed point classes of f-bar. We prove that if X is the Moebius band with one (open) disc removed, then MF_d[f] - N_d(f) < 2 for all maps f : (X, dX) --> (X, dX). This result is the final step in the boundary-Wecken classification of surfaces, which is as follows. If X is the disc, annulus or Moebius band, then X is boundary-Wecken, that is, MF_d[f] = N_d(f) for all boundary-preserving maps. If X is the disc with two discs removed or the Moebius band with one disc removed, then X is not boundary-Wecken, but MF_d[f] - N_d(f) < 2. All other surfaces are totally non-boundary-Wecken, that is, given an integer k > 0, there is a map $f_k : (X, dX) --> (X, dX) such that MF_d[f_k] - N_d(f_k) >= k.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.