Paper detail

The boron absorption line at 2089.6 AA in HD 140283 ?

We have observed the B I line at 2089.6 AA in the metal poor star HD 140283 with HST/STIS. The observation was an attempt to confirm the B abundances derived from the 2497 AA B I line in earlier works in general, and for for this star in particular (Edvardsson et al. 1994 A&A 290, 176; Kiselman & Carlsson 1996, A&A 311, 680). The resulting spectrum gained from 8 orbits of observations is hardly consistent with the boron abundance derived in the earlier works. A pure 10^B line could produce the feature observed but no reasonable process can produce such a ratio between 10^B and 11^B. More likely the analysed feature is affected by a statistical fluctuation. A conservative upper limit estimate of the NLTE corrected boron abundance gives a value marginally consistent with that derived from the 2497 AA line. We are proposing further observations to derive a more definite abundance from the line.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.