Paper detail

The Boolean Hierarchy over Level 1/2 of the Straubing-Therien Hierarchy

For some fixed alphabet A, a language L of A* is in the class L(1/2) of the Straubing-Therien hierarchy if and only if it can be expressed as a finite union of languages A*aA*bA*...A*cA*, where a,b,...,c are letters. The class L(1) is defined as the boolean closure of L(1/2). It is known that the classes L(1/2) and L(1) are decidable. We give a membership criterion for the single classes of the boolean hierarchy over L(1/2). From this criterion we can conclude that this boolean hierarchy is proper and that its classes are decidable.In finite model theory the latter implies the decidability of the classes of the boolean hierarchy over the class Sigma(1) of the FO(<)-logic. Moreover we prove a ``forbidden-pattern'' characterization of L(1) of the type: L is in L(1) if and only if a certain pattern does not appear in the transition graph of a deterministic finite automaton accepting L. We discuss complexity theoretical consequences of our results.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.