Paper detail

The blue UV slopes of z~4 Lyman break galaxies: implications for the corrected star formation rate density

We plan to analyse dust extinction in Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) by introducing a new and more reliable approach to their selection and to the characterization of their distribution of UV slopes beta, using deep IR images from HST. We exploit deep WFC3 IR observations of the ERS and HUDF fields over GOODS-South, combined with HST-ACS optical data, to select z~4 LBGs through a new (B-V) vs. (V-H) colour diagram. The UV slope of the selected galaxies is robustly determined by a linear fit over their observed I, Z, Y, J magnitudes, coherently with the original definition of beta. The same fit is used to determine their rest-frame UV magnitudes M1600 through a simple interpolation. We estimate the effect of observational uncertainties with detailed simulations that we also exploit, under a parametric maximum-likelihood approach, to constrain the probability density function of UV slopes PDF(beta) as a function of rest-frame magnitude. We find 142 and 25 robust LBGs in the ERS and HUDF fields respectively, limiting our sample to S/N(H)>10 objects. Our newly defined criteria improve the selection of z~4 LBGs and allow us to exclude red interlopers at lower redshift, especially z~3-3.5 objects. We find that z~4 LBGs are characterized by blue UV slopes, suggesting a low dust extinction: all L<L* galaxies have an average UV slope <beta>\simeq-2.1, while brighter objects only are slightly redder (<beta> -1.9). We find an intrinsic dispersion ~ 0.3 for PDF(beta) at all magnitudes. The SFRD at z~4 corrected according to these estimates turns out to be lower than previously found: log(SFRD)\simeq-1.09 M_sun/yr/Mpc^3. Finally, we discuss how the UV slope of z~4 galaxies changes as a function of the dust-corrected UV magnitude (i.e. SFR) showing that most galaxies with a high SFR (> 80 M_sun/yr) are highly extincted objects. [Abridged]

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access16 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.