Paper detail

The Blue Straggler Population of the Globular Cluster M5: Comparison with M3

We have surveyed the blue straggler star population of the Galactic globular cluster M5 using high-resolution images of the core along with wide-field ground-based images reaching to more than 19 core radii. To gauge M5's relative efficiency of producing stragglers, we compared our sample to five studies of other globular clusters (mainly Ferraro et al. 1997b; Ferraro et al 2003; and Piotto et al. 2004). Using a "bright" sample selected in the same way as Ferraro et al. 1997b, we found a bimodal radial distribution similar to those found in three other luminous clusters. When the radial distributions for different clusters are scaled using the core radius, there is good cluster-to-cluster agreement in the size of the core straggler sample and the center of the "zone of avoidance". However, M5 has the smallest fraction of stragglers in the zone of avoidance of any of the clusters measured to date, and its zone of avoidance appears to be wider (in r / r_c) than that of M3, which has a very similar surface brightness profile. Both of these facts indicate that M5's straggler population has dynamically evolved to a larger extent than M3. Using an ultraviolet sample from Hubble Space Telescope selected in the same way as Ferraro et al. 2003 and Ferraro et al. 2004, we find that the frequency of blue stragglers in M5 is lower than all but two of the clusters examined. We also identified seven bright blue stragglers that were previously misidentified as HB stars by Sandquist et al. (2004). These bright stragglers are most likely the result of stellar collisions involving binary stars.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.